Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EuphmanKB's avatar

I had intended to highlight two separate mechanisms of retribution: bludgeoning and money. While coupled within Project 2025 I see them as independent agents.

TFG uses White Nationalist and Dominionist action as tools to literally bludgeon, physically and rhetorically, opponents into submission. MTG’s prodominionist speeches and the 1/6 Proud Boys actions are but two egregious examples. His “political speech” defenses in his court cases are another example. A nuanced imitation of innocence by a dripping fanged growling wolf who is masquerading as a duck isn’t free speech. It’s fear inspiring intimidation hiding behind legal hair splitting, and wrong.

Massive corporate sponsor money is a political tool only enabled via Citizens United and the nondisclosed PACS that arose in its wake. The 85 or so entities sponsoring Project 2025 are all supported by undisclosed donations from oligarchs and corporate America, as are the PACS supporting GOP paleoconservative politicians. Merely looking at the cash flows into PACS following Citizens is sufficient evidence. Worse is that political “leaders” are selected purely by their ability to raise money from corporate and “individual” supporters. Dig into how Representatives spend their time after Gingrich changed the “leadership rules.” Maybe 20% of their time is spent in phone bank call centers speaking with contributors, and not on actual legislative business. McCarthy and Pelosi did not become “leaders” by doing great works. They merely raised more money by making promises that, as “leaders” they may or may not be able to keep. Citizens United merely broke the dam and flooded the political valleys with vast new sources of money.

I suspect that most Americans don’t think deeply about most things. They are too busy just trying to survive each day and have no energy to spend otherwise. Change is difficult for most of them and following a charismatic social personality who appears to care about them is far easier than intellectually deciding a path to follow that they can’t or won’t discuss with their family, friends or neighbors at dinner for fear of offending someone’s cherished beliefs, be they religious or (outdated) political internalizations.

Somehow your excellent work needs to be condensed into “elevator pitch” digestible bites that the public cans grab on the fly.

Expand full comment
EuphmanKB's avatar

Yabut... I’m thinking they are afraid of becoming targets, directly via White Nationalist and Dominionist threats and indirectly by corporate advertisers pulling ads. NYT, NPR and WAPO have the staffing and intensity to pursue this. But, post Citizens United and the Gingrich fund raising Congressional seniority system, corporate money is insidiously and secretly dominating everything political, including the far right power pyramid folks in your article. Daylight is the cure.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts