Nobody wants this to be true more than me but you have elaborated way past the error you are making and rolling with it. Their laptops were connected not the voting machines. Laptops aren't connected to the voting machines so you're going on about voting machines shall not be connected to the Internet and there's nothing in this article that says the voting machines were connected to Starlink. Your smoking gun isn't smoking without anything saying that a voting machine was connected to the Internet. Find that and this a great article. But right now you've jumped way down a rabbit hole much too soon. Imagine they said their cell phones were connected to starlink. This is the same thing. This is their stupid support laptops. Not voting machines.
If you had taken the time to actually look at the material presented you would have seen that yes connectivity to laptops and the Starlink system does happen. As can be seen in this one quote from above in the California "Voting System Performance Standards under section 7.5.1 OEVT "Scope and Priorities" c. xiii, as follows:
"xiii. The OEVT team should not consider the voting device vulnerabilities that
require Internet connectivity for exploitation if the voting device is not
connected to the Internet during the election and otherwise. However, if
the voting device is connected to another device which in turn may have
been connected to the Internet (as may be the case of epollbooks), Internet
based attacks may be plausible and should be investigated. " (Page 131-PDF/125-Paper)
An epollbook as mentioned above is a laptop type of device.
And also further down in my "coloring book" is this warning from the National Institute of Science and Technology in a blunt statement about the fact that internet connectivity of Election Management Systems (EMS) is a fact and reality:
"Finally, it is important to note that many computers which host the EMS are laptops which have wireless internet capacity installed which could make them vulnerable to online attacks. All of these situations create an Internet connection which could be exploited to compromise vote data."
If you had taken the time to actually look at the material presented you would have seen that yes connectivity to laptops and the Starlink system does happen. As can be seen in this one quote from above in the California "Voting System Performance Standards under section 7.5.1 OEVT "Scope and Priorities" c. xiii, as follows:
"xiii. The OEVT team should not consider the voting device vulnerabilities that
require Internet connectivity for exploitation if the voting device is not
connected to the Internet during the election and otherwise. However, if
the voting device is connected to another device which in turn may have
been connected to the Internet (as may be the case of epollbooks), Internet
based attacks may be plausible and should be investigated. " (Page 131-PDF/125-Paper)
An epollbook as mentioned above is a laptop type of device.
And also further down in my "coloring book" is this warning from the National Institute of Science and Technology in a blunt statement about the fact that internet connectivity of Election Management Systems (EMS) is a fact and reality:
"Finally, it is important to note that many computers which host the EMS are laptops which have wireless internet capacity installed which could make them vulnerable to online attacks. All of these situations create an Internet connection which could be exploited to compromise vote data."
Good article Robert and I would like to use this cartoon in my next book please. How do I get permission? Your theory about the voting machines connected to Starlink needs verification. The Republicans won this election for one reason - the gullible and easily deceived American public do not have a clue how they have been hoodwinked and mislead. It may take years for them to figure it out, but in the meantime we have a Russian-stooge sleeping in the WH and controlled by Putin. And it was in the 1950's that Khrushchev said "We will take America without firing a shot. We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within." He later said in 1956 that "The Russians would defeat us from within by infiltrating our institutions with communist ideology and demoralising our confidence in our own culture." The 2020 Consensus told us that there are over three million Russian citizens living in the United States. So 68 years after Khrushchev's speech about "we will bury you", they have succeeded. I would guess that at least 80% or more of our country do not have a clue what has happened or why. Elizabeth Graham "From Democracy to Democrazy"
Hello Elizabeth. It has been some time since we have interacted. I would like to first correct the erroneous notion of the "Voting Machines" what America has now are Election Management Systems (EMS) of which there are myriads upon myriads of moving and static parts.
In order for the Starlink Internet Connectivity (SIC) to be present in the story that leads my article the SIC would have to by law be present and part of the California Election Management System Standards, the standards of which i provided multiple screen shots of and a PDF copy and a URL link.
There is quite simply zero questions about the reality and fact of the SIC being connected into the USA Election Management Systems.
Also consider Elon Musk's one-on-one relationship that they are no longer hiding away from the public. That is connection enough for me to start digging, as I have been for the past week now. I have a nascent theory rapidly blossoming in my mind. I am definitely seeing a pattern emerge.
On a closely related note I think that you will find the following item to be of interest to you.
"Trump to rely on forces that brought him to power — Russian presidential aide"
Hello Elizabeth. It has been some time since we have interacted. I would like to first correct the erroneous notion of the "Voting Machines" what America has now are Election Management Systems (EMS) of which there are myriads upon myriads of moving and static parts.
In order for the Starlink Internet Connectivity (SIC) to be present in the story that leads my article the SIC would have to by law be present and part of the California Election Management System Standards, the standards of which I provided multiple screen shots of and a PDF copy and a URL link.
There is quite simply zero questions about the reality and fact of the SIC being connected into the USA Election Management Systems.
Also consider Elon Musk's one-on-one relationship that they are no longer hiding away from the public. That is connection enough for me to start digging, as I have been for the past week now. I have a nascent theory rapidly blossoming in my mind. I am definitely seeing a pattern emerge.
On a closely related note I think that you will find the following item to be of interest to you.
"Trump to rely on forces that brought him to power — Russian presidential aide"
Hey I have been trying to wake these fools up since I watched the stealing in action in PA. I sight the state of Colorado & Iowa as the canaries in the coalmine for them to explain & understand that HE stole it again. Iowa polled differently & had Harris in the lead. The other polls were intentionally rigged, as was the poll suggesting that Biden's favorability were only in the 30% range, which we discovered was not true. But the press wouldn't stay on the story, of course. Ari Melber was like an annoying mosquito constantly bringing it up daily....pretending these polls rigged by reTHUGs were 100%. He was WRONG as they all were. They mixed in as many as 80 different fake polls trending to the RIGHT, yet the media never acknowledged that.
Just a couple of things about Colorado & Iowa is that generally they are RED states. Iowa polling with Harris ahead tells you that Iowa was stolen. Now, Colorado is a different story though, Colorado went BLUE, but the thing to know about CO is that their election system, the way they do it is the most accurate in the U.S. So....if you can follow my logic here, you have to say "wait a minute, why didn't Trump/Elon/Putin steal that state too"? It's because they couldn't steal it.
That's not my only reason for calling it stolen, but it's something people never mention. I guess they just gloss over it or don't think it's significant, but I think it is significant.
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
Nobody wants this to be true more than me but you have elaborated way past the error you are making and rolling with it. Their laptops were connected not the voting machines. Laptops aren't connected to the voting machines so you're going on about voting machines shall not be connected to the Internet and there's nothing in this article that says the voting machines were connected to Starlink. Your smoking gun isn't smoking without anything saying that a voting machine was connected to the Internet. Find that and this a great article. But right now you've jumped way down a rabbit hole much too soon. Imagine they said their cell phones were connected to starlink. This is the same thing. This is their stupid support laptops. Not voting machines.
If you had taken the time to actually look at the material presented you would have seen that yes connectivity to laptops and the Starlink system does happen. As can be seen in this one quote from above in the California "Voting System Performance Standards under section 7.5.1 OEVT "Scope and Priorities" c. xiii, as follows:
"xiii. The OEVT team should not consider the voting device vulnerabilities that
require Internet connectivity for exploitation if the voting device is not
connected to the Internet during the election and otherwise. However, if
the voting device is connected to another device which in turn may have
been connected to the Internet (as may be the case of epollbooks), Internet
based attacks may be plausible and should be investigated. " (Page 131-PDF/125-Paper)
An epollbook as mentioned above is a laptop type of device.
And also further down in my "coloring book" is this warning from the National Institute of Science and Technology in a blunt statement about the fact that internet connectivity of Election Management Systems (EMS) is a fact and reality:
"Finally, it is important to note that many computers which host the EMS are laptops which have wireless internet capacity installed which could make them vulnerable to online attacks. All of these situations create an Internet connection which could be exploited to compromise vote data."
If you had taken the time to actually look at the material presented you would have seen that yes connectivity to laptops and the Starlink system does happen. As can be seen in this one quote from above in the California "Voting System Performance Standards under section 7.5.1 OEVT "Scope and Priorities" c. xiii, as follows:
"xiii. The OEVT team should not consider the voting device vulnerabilities that
require Internet connectivity for exploitation if the voting device is not
connected to the Internet during the election and otherwise. However, if
the voting device is connected to another device which in turn may have
been connected to the Internet (as may be the case of epollbooks), Internet
based attacks may be plausible and should be investigated. " (Page 131-PDF/125-Paper)
An epollbook as mentioned above is a laptop type of device.
And also further down in my "coloring book" is this warning from the National Institute of Science and Technology in a blunt statement about the fact that internet connectivity of Election Management Systems (EMS) is a fact and reality:
"Finally, it is important to note that many computers which host the EMS are laptops which have wireless internet capacity installed which could make them vulnerable to online attacks. All of these situations create an Internet connection which could be exploited to compromise vote data."
Good article Robert and I would like to use this cartoon in my next book please. How do I get permission? Your theory about the voting machines connected to Starlink needs verification. The Republicans won this election for one reason - the gullible and easily deceived American public do not have a clue how they have been hoodwinked and mislead. It may take years for them to figure it out, but in the meantime we have a Russian-stooge sleeping in the WH and controlled by Putin. And it was in the 1950's that Khrushchev said "We will take America without firing a shot. We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within." He later said in 1956 that "The Russians would defeat us from within by infiltrating our institutions with communist ideology and demoralising our confidence in our own culture." The 2020 Consensus told us that there are over three million Russian citizens living in the United States. So 68 years after Khrushchev's speech about "we will bury you", they have succeeded. I would guess that at least 80% or more of our country do not have a clue what has happened or why. Elizabeth Graham "From Democracy to Democrazy"
Hello Elizabeth. It has been some time since we have interacted. I would like to first correct the erroneous notion of the "Voting Machines" what America has now are Election Management Systems (EMS) of which there are myriads upon myriads of moving and static parts.
In order for the Starlink Internet Connectivity (SIC) to be present in the story that leads my article the SIC would have to by law be present and part of the California Election Management System Standards, the standards of which i provided multiple screen shots of and a PDF copy and a URL link.
There is quite simply zero questions about the reality and fact of the SIC being connected into the USA Election Management Systems.
Also consider Elon Musk's one-on-one relationship that they are no longer hiding away from the public. That is connection enough for me to start digging, as I have been for the past week now. I have a nascent theory rapidly blossoming in my mind. I am definitely seeing a pattern emerge.
On a closely related note I think that you will find the following item to be of interest to you.
"Trump to rely on forces that brought him to power — Russian presidential aide"
https://tass.com/politics/1870713
Hello Elizabeth. It has been some time since we have interacted. I would like to first correct the erroneous notion of the "Voting Machines" what America has now are Election Management Systems (EMS) of which there are myriads upon myriads of moving and static parts.
In order for the Starlink Internet Connectivity (SIC) to be present in the story that leads my article the SIC would have to by law be present and part of the California Election Management System Standards, the standards of which I provided multiple screen shots of and a PDF copy and a URL link.
There is quite simply zero questions about the reality and fact of the SIC being connected into the USA Election Management Systems.
Also consider Elon Musk's one-on-one relationship that they are no longer hiding away from the public. That is connection enough for me to start digging, as I have been for the past week now. I have a nascent theory rapidly blossoming in my mind. I am definitely seeing a pattern emerge.
On a closely related note I think that you will find the following item to be of interest to you.
"Trump to rely on forces that brought him to power — Russian presidential aide"
https://tass.com/politics/1870713
Hey I have been trying to wake these fools up since I watched the stealing in action in PA. I sight the state of Colorado & Iowa as the canaries in the coalmine for them to explain & understand that HE stole it again. Iowa polled differently & had Harris in the lead. The other polls were intentionally rigged, as was the poll suggesting that Biden's favorability were only in the 30% range, which we discovered was not true. But the press wouldn't stay on the story, of course. Ari Melber was like an annoying mosquito constantly bringing it up daily....pretending these polls rigged by reTHUGs were 100%. He was WRONG as they all were. They mixed in as many as 80 different fake polls trending to the RIGHT, yet the media never acknowledged that.
Just a couple of things about Colorado & Iowa is that generally they are RED states. Iowa polling with Harris ahead tells you that Iowa was stolen. Now, Colorado is a different story though, Colorado went BLUE, but the thing to know about CO is that their election system, the way they do it is the most accurate in the U.S. So....if you can follow my logic here, you have to say "wait a minute, why didn't Trump/Elon/Putin steal that state too"? It's because they couldn't steal it.
That's not my only reason for calling it stolen, but it's something people never mention. I guess they just gloss over it or don't think it's significant, but I think it is significant.
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
https://blog.voteforlove.net/2024/11/20/unhack-the-2024-presidential-election/
It appears absolutely nothing substantial was done to look into any of your allegations!
Do you or anyone know of any hard copy evidence that DOJ should have acted upon ?